Tuesday, 17 November 2015

RIP Tracks and Bad Order Cars

A new #2 wheelset is indicative that GACX 469523 has been to a RIP track recently. Also note the repositioned reflective striping and the A-end draft key has been painted, both of which likely occurred at the same time as the wheelset was replaced. 

The December 2015 issue of Model Railroader has an interesting article on railrcar repair by Matt Snell. I’d been meaning to write this for a while, so I thought I’d take this opportunity to expand on some of what matt wrote about. My summer occupation for the past number of years has been working in the Fleet department at one of Canada’s largest private railcar owners (I’ll let you do the math on that). One of my primary responsibilities was reviewing, understanding, and to some extent, auditing railcar repair bills, both from home shops as well as those received from the railroads for running repairs made in normal operation of a railcar. As a modeller, I found much of the information, practices, and procedures fascinating but generally unknown to many other modellers. We often tend to focus on locomotives or operations as higher-profile elements of the hobby (anyone else have about one locomotive for every five freight cars on their layout?), but it seems to me that there aren’t many “freight car guys” out there. You know who you are, rivet-counters! I thought I’d try and explain some of what goes into the repair of modern freight cars and how it can relate to model railroad operations.

Background

Any railroad in North America participating in interchange (i.e. almost every one except for QNS&L, isolated railroads not connected to any other, or private passenger carriers) must comply with the Association of American Railroad (AAR) Manual of Interchange rules. Set out in the rulebook (actually comprised of an office manual and a field manual) are lists of correct procedures that ensures safe and fair treatment of a car if repaired by someone other than the car owner. Approved parts, procedures, and correct repairs are covered in rules that apply to specific parts or procedures. For example, rule 36 covers roller bearings, and rule 41 covers wheels. When a railcar, private or railway-owned, operates in interchange it almost certainly travels over multiple railroads, and thus can be expected to be repaired at almost any point in its’ journey. When I say repaired, this may be from damage (e.g. collision), or from normal wear and tear on consumable items like brake shoes and wheelsets (wheelset covers the axle, bearings, and wheels, grouped together for billing purposes). Thus, a standard set of rules is needed to ensure that repairs are made correctly to the car, regardless of where they are performed. In general, except in the event of a derailment (or for some specialty cars including tank cars), a railroad will usually elect to repair a defective car themselves rather than go through the hassle of contacting the car owner and coordinating for movement to the owner’s home or contract shop. Nothing would ever move if every time there was a high-impact wheelset the car was sent to home shop (nor, in most cases, would it be safe to do so). Thus, for certain job codes, blanket approval is provided under the interchange rules for railroads to conduct specific repairs without prior approval from the car owner. In most instances, for example, a high-impact wheel is changed and the car owner billed at the end of the month (all AAR billing is done once a month, at accounting period month-end).

Types of Repairs

The interchange rules cover a wide variety of possible repairs to railcars of many types. Some repairs are common to all types (such as replacement of wheelsets), while others are specific to a car type (e.g. repairing a door on a boxcar). Some defects are detected automatically such as high-impact wheels, where tread defects result in high impact forces when the defect (a small deviation from roundness) collides with the rail surface, resulting in the distinctive sound every time the defective wheel rotates. Automated Wheel Impact Load Detectors (WILD) use sophisticated strain gauges placed on the rail to measure train forces and identify high-impact cars. By knowing the axle number within a train consist, the detection equipment can identify the axle’s position within a train and match it to a certain wheel on a railcar based on reading its’ automatic equipment identification (AEI) tags, which are RFID transponders located on opposite corners of a railcar (2 per car). When a high impact alert is generated, it is reported through Railinc, the AAR’s electronic data interface with car owners, and monitored until it exceeds allowable limits. When that occurs, the car is flagged in a railroad’s computer system for replacement of the wheelset with the defective wheel. Similar processes occur for hotbox detection (thermal scanners, acoustic detection equipment). Another potential defect is an air brake test; every railcar must have a five-year brake test conducted, which is them reported in UMLER (Universal Mechanical Language and Equipment Register, a Railinc online tool for railcar data management). If a car exceeds five years without a brake test, it will be bad ordered to the railroad’s nearest shop track, and the brake test conducted. Similar to WILD detectors, truck hunting detectors can sense excessive lateral loads in the rails, an indicator that a truck on a railcar is “hunting”. That is, as the truck components wear, alignment between the bolster and sideframes weakens, allowing the wheels to oscillate from side to side instead of tracking a straight path. This condition is known cause derailments, particularly on long, light cars such as flatcars and gons. A truck hunting alert will usually trigger a trip to a repair track or home shop to tear down the truck(s) and replace any worn components (such as friction wedges).

Other defects are noted upon inspection. For example, when a train is assembled at a yard, a carman will observe a roll-by inspection, or drive the length of the train and look for defects. These can include things like: dragging equipment (air hoses), thin wheels, defective safety appliances (handrails), defective reflective striping, or loose or shifted loads. Still other defects are noticed by operating crews, such as: defective coupler cut levers, broken knuckles, or air brake problems (e.g. defective air brake valves).

UTCX 49270 and another loaded plastic pellet hopper sit on one of the RIP tracks at the west end of CN's yard in London, ON. Likely the result of a minor derailment, plastic pellets have flowed out of each car due to broken/cracked pneumatic discharge outlets on the gates, a common problem even in a minor derailment because they nozzles are so low to the rail. This repair would likely result in a trip to a home shop (once sent to customer and emptied), since railroads generally don't repair plastic pellet hopper gates. Storage of some spare wheelsets can be seen at lower left. 


Repairing Those Defects

After reading the above section, it may seem like there are a lot of things that can go wrong with a railcar; that is generally true, but a railcar is not likely to have multiple defects at the same time (though, for example, while brake testing a car, the carman might also notice other defects such as a cracked coupler body). Likewise, the frequency with which a car may require repairs (except perhaps, for brake shoes) is usually very low. Unless required due to collision or derailment, a car may run thousands of miles without any major repairs. But when a car does need to be repaired, where does it go? Generally, the nearest place capable of repairing it. Most larger yards on Class 1 railroads incorporate some form of a repair-in-place (RIP) track where minor/quick repairs can be made with minimal delay in transit, especially important for loaded cars. A typical RIP track will usually have somewhere that the car can be jacked up (to replace wheelsets or truck components), and may be located adjacent to a building used by carmen to store parts or for office space. Sometimes, a RIP track may have its’ own car mover (e.g. Trackmobile) to avoid tying up other yard engines. Some shortlines that do not have capacity to conduct repairs may have an arrangement in place for a nearby Class 1 to conduct repairs.

If a railroad determines that a repair is beyond the scope of what they can handle, such as derailment damage or specialized repairs on tank cars, hopper cars, or other specialty equipment, they can contact the car owner and request disposition to a home shop (operated by the car owner, such as a leasing company), or a third-party repair shop designated by the car owner (assuming car is safe to move on it’s own wheels). If a car is damaged heavily, either from a wreck, or through typical operation (such as a broken sill), and the car is not safe to move on own wheels, the railroad can settle with the car owner for depreciated value (I think I’ll do a future post on this, as this is a lot of what I worked on during my tenure at my summer employer).

At left, the RIP track at CP's Quebec Street yard in London is pretty full today. Looks like the carmen will have their work cut out for them! The building at centre is used to store MOW supplies and spare parts. Note the concrete pad for jacking a car just above the power line. 


Bad Order Cars and the Model Railroader
This is all interesting prototype information (to me, anyhow), but how does this relate to model railroad operations? Have you ever been switching in a yard and you can’t make a joint because one car has a broken coupler? (Recall those lousy plastic couplers Walthers used for years?!) While we may not be able to implement automated defect detection on a model railroad (but wouldn’t that be cool?) we can still interact with bad order cars. Similar to above, if you find a car with a missing coupler spring, bad order it to the RIP track. If you don’t have one on your layout or yard, perhaps park the car on a lightly used spur or siding where the carman can come on-site and repair it. Another common problem with model railcars is tight (or loose) trucks, leading to derailments or excessive (unprototypical) rocking and rolling while in motion. Dragging coupler trip pins are another reason your yard crew could send a car to the RIP track. There are many other reasons I’m sure, and these are just a few. An alternative that I have seen modeled is to randomly bad order a car during an operating session. This mainly applies to modern layouts where one has modeled a WILD or hotbox detector, but in theory, anyone can spot a wheelset with a thin rim or that is high impact (for steam-era modelers, repacking the journal waste would be a common bad order reason). For even more realism, Boulder Creek Engineering has developed an HO scale defect detector remarkably similar to prototype railroads’ defect detectors (http://www.bouldercreekengineering.com/trainboss.php) . One can program the automated voice messages, defect types (hotboxes, dragging equipment, etc), and defect probability. The system uses optical sensors to count axles and will playback other data as well (temperature, speed, etc). I think it’s a pretty neat way to add some realism, especially for your operating crew whose train gets caught by the detector with a defect!

Presently, I have two cars on the RIP track, which is adjacent to the yard (the diesel shop will be located on tracks at lower right). CMO 21277, an Athearn RTR Trinity 5161 CF hopper is bad ordered for a missing B-end hopper gate (fell off in box), while PROX 43931 needs a new A-end coupler spring, a common defect with the McHenry scale-head couplers. Once complete, a pad to jack cars and some spare parts will be added to the RIP track.

A typical RIP track doesn’t need much to be set up as such. The primary consideration is a safe place to jack a car, such as a concrete pad or wooden planks to create a relatively flat surface. Likewise, crane(s), forklifts, and spare components such as wheelsets can also be placed near the RIP track for added realism. And if you have the space, one might place a carman’s office nearby, or have the carman work out of the yard office if a separate building isn’t possible.

I think that’s enough for now,
‘Til next time,


-        Peter.

Thursday, 12 November 2015

Throwback Thursday (err, Friday!) #22 - CN Stuart Street Yard Over the Years, by Keith MacCauley

I started this post when it was Thursday, but the night seemed to get away from me, so maybe we'll call this a "flashback Friday" instead... Anyway, tonight's post features another article by my dad, Keith. It's one that I had been wanting to write for a long time, but he beat me to it! I hope to expand on it in the future, though I don't have any set time frame for doing so - one of those "someday" projects. Over to you now Keith.

- Peter.


Classic 1970's Canadian railroading in the Steel City: MLW switcher, tank cars with a "flying P" logo on them, and lots of cars with friction bearing trucks.
In the above photo, we find CN S-4 8169 (MLW 9/1956) shown sorting a quartet of tank cars at the Bay Street end of the Hamilton-located Stuart Street Yard. Nose-coupled to the veteran switcher are a trio of non-insulated 20,000 gallon (US) tank cars along with an underframe style tank car emblazoned ‘AIR LIQUIDE’. The scene is a wonderful synopsis of ‘traditional’ railroading (technically in Canada it would be ‘railwaying’, but this sounds silly!): flat switching, end cab switchers, forty foot boxcars, and of course, cabooses (or ‘vans’ in Canada). Note the cupola on the second car on the rip track.

In just over three years Canadian National would embark upon a mammoth upgrade/rebuild program on its vast GP9 fleet at their Pointe St. Charles facility that would ultimately eschew the likes of 8169 and brethren. CN 8169 would soldier on long enough to receive updated 1973 decoration with an all-orange cab (http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=3438358), but would be set aside out of service in the early 1980’s. Seemingly, except for maintenance, the old girl never wandered away from Hamilton, prior to her demise.
The non-insulated tank cars are nominal 70-ton capacity (220,000 lbs total Gross Rail Load) most likely constructed in the late 1960’s/early 1970’s. Tank cars of this size and style (so called ‘non-pressure’, non-insulated equipped with hinged & bolted manway cover and bottom outlet valve) would primarily have been deployed in gasoline and diesel fuel-, or other similar-density flammable liquid service. Similar to the S-4, bigger and better technology in the form of 30,000 gallon/100 ton (263,000 lbs total Gross Rail Load) capacity would usurp their duties and eventually render them obsolete, though not as rapidly.

Note the track parts along the path beside the occupied track and materials stacked to the right of the rip track and the collection of maintenance structures in the background. Shortly, the City of Hamilton would embark upon a bay front revitalization initiative and change the surrounding landscape forever.

Stay tuned for future instalments; see below for some plot spoilers!

- Keith.

Fast-forward nearly 40 years: the MLW's, and in fact the CN itself are nearly gone from Stuart Street, replaced instead by EMD's owned by RailAmerica, and operated by the Southern Onrario Railway. Shortly RailAmerica would be acquired by Genesee & Wyoming, bringing a wave of orange and yellow paint to the shortline. 
RLK 4001 was originally constructed by EMD in August of 1959 as Southern Pacific No. 5872. Renumbered to 3708 in 1965, the built as low nose unit would be conveyed to the Central Western Railway and then onto the Lakeland and Waterways Railway, enterprises both located in the province of Alberta. Leaving Western Canada in 2002, the well-travelled locomotive has spent the last decade on the Goderich-Exeter Railway prior to arriving in Hamilton on the Southern Ontario Railway.

Thursday, 5 November 2015

Throwback Thursday #21 - GO Transit #507 & #512 at Toronto, ON C.1979

A cloudy day finds GO GP40TC #507 and F40PH #512 between runs parked near the Spadina coach yards. Scan from an uncredited 35MM Kodak negative from author's collection, circa 1979.
Tonight’s Throwback Thursday takes us back nearly 40 years, to the heart of Toronto passenger operations, Spadina coach yards (or, across the tracks from them as it were). We’re standing on Front Street, looking more/less southwest, and find GO Transit GP40TC #507 and F40PH #512 parked in between the morning and afternoon commuted rushes. Both GMD products, #507 was built in 1967 as the highest-numbered of the eight GP40TC's built specifically for GO's Toronto commuter (hence the "TC") service that began a year later. Noteworthy for early incorporation of diesel HEP systems, the units were constructed on SD40 frames to accommodate a Detroit Diesel engine to supply hotel power to the train. Other unique features include the short pug nose, front GO sign on the handrails (which even lasted well into Amtrak ownership), snow shields and small fuel tank. By this point was on its’ third number, after being built as CN 607 (engines were built prior to commencement of GO operations, and ran on CN for a number of months in a muted black and orange paint scheme before being repainted to GO Transit colours), the engine was then renumbered to GO 607, then to 9807 in 1970, and the onto 507 in 1975. F40PH #512 was a 1978 graduate of GMD, lasting its’ entire ten year career with GO under the same number. Interestingly, both units were sold to Amtrak, with #507 becoming AMTK 199 in 1988, and upon retirement in 1988 (supplanted by the first order of F59PH’s) GO #512 became AMTK 412 in 1990. Rebuilt in 1991, with the addition of dynamic brakes (GO F40’s were the only such units built without dynamic brakes) and an air conditioner, AMTK 412 survived until retirement and subsequent scrapping in March 2000. Interestingly, despite being eleven years older, AMTK 199 survives on the present Amtrak roster, albeit in a modified form. Now GP38H-3 #527, and despite the removal of the middle radiator fan and the engine’s turbocharger, the locomotive still retains much of its' 1967 appearance; it’s even been painted in Amtrak’s latest silver and dark blue paint scheme! The engine is now a terminal switcher assigned to Philadelphia, along the passenger carrier’s Northeast Corridor – a long way from hauling Toronto commuters!

Aside from the engines, there’s plenty to look at in this photo. Aside from the GO equipment, there is plenty to look at for the passenger rail enthusiast, including VIA Blueline equipment, Tempo cars, and even a VIA-painted Turbo train consist (!). A ubiquitous CN S-13 switcher, #8517, looks to be paused in between moves handling the hundreds of passenger cars moved about the terminal each day. Another thing I like about the photo is the great number of billboards in the background – Molson, Toyota, Dodge/Plymouth, Tip Top Tailors, MTV Cable 4 and more; I wonder what happened to them all? They seemed to be all over the place back then, but have long since disappeared from the area; I always thought they provided a neat little time capsule in photos to see what was being advertised at the time (when was the last time you say a Plymouth or a Marlboro being advertised?). A bit more subtle, note the cranes behind the GO equipment and the wood fencing at left – it would appear that construction of the “fly-under” is well under way (note safety fencing at left). Construction of the fly-under allowed GO and VIA trains to navigate from one side of Union Station's numerous tracks to the other without having to pass through a myriad of difficult-to-maintain crossovers (such as double-slip switches). As VIA’s Turbos were retired in 1982, this image is likely from the very late 1970’s or early 1980’s (construction of the fly-under did coincide with VIA Turbo operation).

A Google Maps satellite shot of the same area as the subject photo. Note that high-price high-rises now dominate the area where the coach yards now stood. The fly-under can be seen at middle-right. Out of view at right is the Skydome, which stands roughly where the Spadina roundhouse was once located. 


'Til next time,
Cheers,
Peter.


Sunday, 25 October 2015

HO Rolling Stock Review: Accurail 4750 CF Rib-side Hopper


CSXT 251362, a completed Accurail 4750 CF hopper kit with upgraded trucks and couplers. As far as kits go, it was a joy to build!

Recently I purchased two Accurail 4750-cf ribside hopper car kits, after wanting to get some for quite some time. Other manufacturers such as Intermountain and Tangent Scale Models had already produced highly-detailed models of similar prototypes, with wire grab irons, brake lines, etc. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with companies producing highly-detailed models, though in my opinion, the budget-minded segment (such as Atlas Trainman) has considerable room for growth; one can still buy and apply wire grab irons like modellers have done for a number of years to create a higher degree of accuracy. This I think is even more true for Canadian modellers, presently facing a 25% difference between the US and Canadian dollar. But I digress…

Back to the model: Typical to Accurail’s previous offerings, the kit came neatly packed for assembly. Initial impressions were positive, with good graphics and clean molding lines (no flashing at all). One early observation was that the roofwalks are molded onto the car, and done so pretty nicely. I consider this a plus, since they won’t bow or warp like every single one of my Intermountain cars has done. Even more so if the car is to be taken to a club, or handled manually a lot. Likewise, the end platform castings of the handrails and ladders was rather impressive – I’d say on-par with older Intermountain kits, but far less work. The instructions were very straightforward, and assembly of the first kit took me about 35 minutes; the second took less than 20, once I got the hang of the steps. Again typical of Accurail, the car assembled very easily, with minimal filing to get the parts to snap together. The only area that I found needed a bit of work was to get the coupler cover to snap onto the draft sill – nothing more than a minute few passes of the file to get things to fit together. My only real gripe about the kit is that Accurail still supplies them with the unconventional Accumate couplers and 33”plastic wheels (for 70-ton trucks). For a car that uses 36”wheels, the difference is quite noticeable given how easy the trucks are to view on the prototype. So I swapped the couplers for tried-and-true Kadee #5’s and the trucks for 100-ton trucks, in this case Athearn Genesis ASF trucks as that’s what I had lying around. The larger wheels do cause the car to sit higher, but this hasn’t resulted in any operational issues such as pull-aparts (small coupler height  difference).

To sum it up, I think the low-cost, less-detailed 4750 CF hopper by Accurail has a lot to offer – to me, the trade-off between cost and assembly time and a much higher level of detail is worth investing in more of these cars (at an almost 3:1 ratio in price compared to a Tangent car).

I hope to have another layout update, along with some more modelling and prototype pieces, on the blog in the upcoming days and weeks. 'Til next time,

Cheers,
Peter.

A side view of an assembled Accurail kit (CNW, left) compared to an older Intermountain assembled kit (right). Both cars have upgraded tucks from what was included in the kit. Note that the Accurail car rides slightly higher with correct (36") wheels applied. A few things to note: size of vibrator pads on slope sheets, thickness of ladder rungs, and thickness of cast parts such as hopper gate rails. 

Overhead view of same comparison. There's no disguising the fact that the Accurail car is a kit (cast end platform safety appliances), but I like the fact that the castings are much more durable than separately-applied wire parts.