Wednesday, 28 January 2015
Friday, 23 January 2015
F-Unit Friday: Wabash #667 at Canfield Jct. in April 1964
I was going to post this as a Throwback Thursday but it seems the day
got away from me yesterday, so here is a slightly delayed “golden oldie” photo
discussion.
It’s April 1964, and we’re at Canfield Jct (Ontario), a railroad
location roughly fifteen miles east of Hagersville. In this view, we see Wabash
F7A #667 leading a freight westbound on the CN’s Cayuga Subdivision over the
diamond that intersects the CN’s Dunnville subdivision.
It’s April 1964, and the four F7A’s leading this train have just passed
their thirteenth birthday, having graduated GMD London between December 1950
and March 1951. The engines were delivered as part of an order for 20 F7A’s,
along with a single GP7 and three SW8’s. Tax and duty laws made it economically
prohibitive at the time (recall, long before the days of Free Trade) to import
US-built locomotives for Canadian use. The protective tariffs in fact contributed
a significant portion of GMD’s early business as US roads with Canadian
operations dieselized with Canadian-built locomotives (NYC, C&O, Wabash for
example). Hence, these units seldom spent much time outside the country, at
most wandering to Detroit or Buffalo to exchange cars with US roads. The lead
unit, WAB 667 was now on her second number, having been delivered as WAB 1158A,
and would go on to become N&W 3667. Distinctive features on the Canadian-built
F’s included passenger-style pilots, square-top winterization hatches, double
headlights (not often seen on Canadian F’s), and classy chrome-outlined number
boards. About six months after this image was captured, in October 1964, the
N&W leased the Wabash from the majority owner, the Pennsylvania Railroad,
eventually gaining full control by 1970. After a repaint into N&W blue, the
F’s continued to serve in their intended capacity for a number of years before being
supplanted by second-generation power and ultimately met the scrapper’s torch.
If you’re looking for Canfield Junction on a map, you probably won’t
ever find it, but it was synonymous with area railfans as a popular railfanning
destination since it offered a diversity of railroading long since absent from
operations in southern Ontario. Not only did two of CN’s own line cross here,
but the CASO’s (Michigan Central/New York Central) double track mainline from
Fort Erie to Windsor paralleled the CN Cayuga sub and also crossed the Dunville
sub here. One could observe trains from four railroads: the CN, Wabah, NYC, and
C&O (which had trackage rights on the CASO east of St. Thomas). Not only
did this mean paint schemes not native to Canada, but also locomotive models
such as the C&O’s U25B’s or NYC C430’s. Sadly though, time was not kind to
Canfield Jct, with all three lines ultimately being abandoned. The Dunnville
and Cayuga subdivisions, even though they crossed here, were effectively
parallel to not only each other, but in principle the CN’s much busier Grimsby
sub which runs east out of Hamilton to Niagara Falls (Clifton). Over time, as
locally-originated carload traffic dried up, the lines no longer hosted through
freights and became the domain of daily or as-needed locals before finally
meeting abandonment in the 1980’s as all traffic was shifted to the Grimsby and
Stamford subdivisions to move between Fort Erie and Hamilton. Similarly,
through traffic dried up on the CASO, and never having much on-line traffic,
was reduced to only a handful of trains per day by the late 1970’s. Deferred
maintenance and reduced traffic in the Penn Central era eventually meant that
the double track line once fit for 80 mph passenger trains (or higher) was
reduced to operation over only the north track, and at greatly reduced speeds.
As bridge line traffic dried up, or was shifted to an all-US routing, C&O
(later CSX) became the dominant user of the line, but even that did not last as
the line was sold to CN & CP in the early 1990’s. Not really intended for
through use however, the line’s primary value was in the cross-border
connections at each end of the line. That meant that most of what was left in
between was already duplicate trackage, and of little value. Abandonment came,
and like the CN’s own lines through Canfield, track removal left little but
scarred earth to remember the better days at Canfield.
But what was the Wabash doing on CN in the first place? The Midwestern US
road desired to reach Buffalo, NY, a jump-off point for traffic heading for New
England and the northeast US. Arriving somewhat late to the ‘bridge line
through Canada’ game, a deal was struck with CN to exercise trackage rights
from Windsor to Fort Erie by way of the Chatham, Paynes, and Cayuga
subdivisions (among others), informally known as the “air line”. The deal
proved mutually lucrative, as CN gained utilization – hence, revenue – on an
otherwise not very busy line, and the N&W gained high-value automotive
traffic from the Ford plant in St. Thomas (Talbotville). After the abandonment
of the Air Line, Wabash’s successors N&W and eventually Norfolk Southern
were granted trackage rights over the CN Talbot, Dundas, Grimsby, and Stamford
subdivisions pursuant to the original trackage rights deal signed in 1897.The
end of this operation came, however, on December 30, 2006, as the 109 years of
Wabash trackage rights expired, and present owner NS elected not to renew them.
But at least we have numerous images from railfan outings to imaging what it
must have been like back in the day at Canfield.
‘Til next time,
Cheers,
Peter.
Wednesday, 21 January 2015
Wednesday, 14 January 2015
Sunday, 11 January 2015
Winter Layout Work Update (Part 1)
CN 1906 pulls the first loads out of the recently-installed storage tracks in front of the Stelco (Walthers) rolling mill. Looks like they will soon have plenty more loads to pull! |
A few days spent working on the layout over the Christmas break yielded
some significant progress on the layout, namely completing the trackage on the
spur on the left (east) side of the layout. More industries to go and switch
now!
Carpentry
The basic benchwork was already in place, including a sheet of plywood cut
to fit in the available space; all that remained was to secure the sub-roadbed
in place. It was decided to use the two “high-line” switches already in place
to access the spur rather than run a new branch off of the existing yard lead. This
meant that the spur would be at a higher elevation than previously planned –
this allows a more eye-level view of activity on the spur, rather than a more
eye-in-the-sky view. This also helps to blend the high line into the rest of
the layout, rather than it creating a “stair case” illusion and seem to
arbitrarily rise out of the rest of the layout. A total of seven supports were
cut from spare 1x3” stock to elevate the plywood about four inches. Since the
two high line switches were at slightly different elevations due to the grade
that they are on, the elevation of the plywood sheet was set to split the
difference between the two. Three supports were fastened to the benchwork lengthwise
along the plywood and four were installed transversely – this stabilized the
plywood and makes it resistant to any bumps or jolts on the rest of the layout’s
benchwork. As this particular piece of plywood had been stored for a number of
years, one end of the sheet (south end) had developed a significant warp (curl)
that required a 2x4” attached transversely to the bottom to help straighten it
out (2x4 was planed to be perfectly straight). The last step in preparing the
plywood was to cut a hatch approximately 16” square into the middle; this not
only allows access in the event of a derailment or electrical glitch, but will
help with scenic-ing the layout as well. The seven risers (supports) were first
screwed to the bottom of the plywood at pre-marked and measured locations. Once
all were in place, the plywood was positioned at the appropriate height and the
risers clamped in place while pilot holes were drilled and screws put in place.
The sub-roadbed between the two switches on the high line consists of a segment
of plywood approximately six inches wide; a tapered “bridge” piece was placed
between this existing sub-roadbed and the newly installed plywood.
Surprisingly, very little adjustment was needed to align the three pieces of
plywood, and only some slight planing and sanding was required to smooth the
transition from the high line grade to the level plywood surface.
Once the plywood was installed, it was full speed ahead with the
trackwork for the new spur (actually two spurs that cross at a diamond, but
referred to as the spur for clarity). The facing high line switches each feed
one of two tracks that meet at a 90° crossing. The track on the spur is mostly code
83, a mix of Atlas, Shiniohara, and Peco. The north end of the
spur consists of a Walthers rolling mill (to be featured in a later post) that
was cut back to three segments (from original four) and another track next to the rolling mill that will
serve as a bulk fuel dealer. Two tracks will go into the mill building itself, and another two storage tracks were laid next to the building to hold the loads for pickup. The rails have not yet been installed in the building, as the channels in the floor are intended for a cars' wheel flanges, not actual rails. Hence the gap is too narrow to lay rail (gauge is too tight), but that will soon be corrected. These tracks cross over the
access hatch on three sides – each crossing was secured with extra spikes to ensure
the alignment remains intact.
To power the new spur, a new track bus was run under the
previously-unpowered high line and feeders installed between the rails and the
bus wires. Since the high line circles around and forms a reversing loop with what
is essentially the tail of the south yard lead (better-sounding name TBD), a
Digitrax auto-reverser was purchased. Mark made quick work wiring up, so now we
can run trains in a continuous loop up and around the high line.
After lifting cars from Stelco, two empty cars are lifted from the bulk fuel dealer. Extra track is stored temporarily at left. Note the high-tech temporary end of track device! |
Operations
Prior to completing the spur, there were only two industries already in
place on the layout, the grain elevator and the spur near the bridge (at least
for now, “Casco”). The addition of four new industries to switch will now
provide at least enough work for two jobs: a yard job to handle the sorting of
the cars and blocking of mainline freights, as well as switch the grain
elevator and Casco, and a second job to go and switch the spur. With increased
traffic on the layout, this will soon provide the opportunity to implement and
learn about track clearances, car card systems, and how to develop a natural “flow”
to operations between multiple operators. Can’t wait!
Lifting cars from the Stelco storage tracks at right; soon more empties will be spotted inside the building. |
Stay tuned for part II of the layout update sometime later in the week…
Thanks for looking,
Cheers,
Peter.
Thursday, 8 January 2015
Throwback Thursday #5: Grand River Railway #228 and Lake Erie & Northern #337 at Galt in May 1959
GRR 228 and LE&N 337 make a move through the yard at Galt, ON in May 1959. Uncredited slide, author's collection. |
The subject of today’s Throwback Thursday is one of the oldest images
in my collection, dating back almost 66 years to 1959. Though me and all things
electric generally don’t get along well, I do have a soft spot for the former
Canadian Pacific Electric Lines that once ran out of Preston, ON (in modern-day
Cambridge). That is, the old Grand River Railway and the Lake Erie &
Northern Railway which combined to span between Port Dover and Waterloo by way
of Simcoe, Brantford, Paris and Galt, which is where today’s image was taken.
We’re standing in Galt, ON on what appears to be a fine spring day in
May 1959. Though we don’t know who the photographer is (uncredited slide), we
can reasonably assume he was having a pretty good railfanning day when he
snapped this frame. Looking southeast from a location near Samuelson Street
& #8 highway, CPEL motors GRR 228 and LE&N 337 seem to be making a
reverse move towards the camera, judging by the presence of the crew member on
the rear platform of the 228. Both motors were 1921 home-builts, products of Preston Car and Coach. Interestingly, though the two railways were
separate on paper, they operated as one subsequent to a consolidation in 1937 but
maintained separate reporting marks and numbering schemes for equipment (even
numbers for GRR equipment and odd for LE&N, except for LE&N 230, 232,
and 234, which were secondhand acquisitions). These two motors served faithfully
for their owner for forty years, until the end of electrified operations came
on October 1, 1961. Replaced by a handful of SW8’s and SW1200RS’s, the two
motors were sold in 1963 to the Iowa Terminal Railway and shipped to Mason
City, IA. The two motors became ITR #81 and #82 (ex-LE&N 337 and GRR 228
respectively). ITR 82 was never repainted or saw active
service, and was scrapped in 1968; ITR 81 held on a bit longer, meeting the
torch in 1973.
Aside from the CPEL motors in the shot, a number of other features in
the background are also of interest. It would appear that CP was doing
trackwork in the area at the time the photo was taken, judging by the
MOW-service four-axle wooden passenger car behind the motors. Also giving credence
to this theory are a pile of untreated ties and spare switch stands at lower
right. The long-removed water tower used to supply the Orr’s Lake helper
stationed here can also be seen in the background. Seems odd seeing a water tower next to catenary, doesn't it?
While these two motors that once served the electric lines have long since
met their demise, the line that they are on (now known as the CP's Waterloo Subdivision) continues to be an important part
of the Canadian Pacific system in Southern Ontario. A Toyota automobile assembly plant
built in the mid 1980’s a few miles down the line near Hagey provides a substantial
amount of high-value traffic to the rail line. Who would have thought when this
photo was taken that instead of facing abandonment like most of the rest of the
former CPEL, this line would not only survive but thrive?! Trilevels of Toyota
Camry’s and Matrix’s are indeed a long way from the days of steeplecabs and
interurban service.
Thanks for looking,
Cheers,
Peter.
Wednesday, 7 January 2015
Thursday, 1 January 2015
Throwback Friday #4 - CN #1349 at Thorold in July 1995
CN 1349 heads southward down Pine Street on the Fonthill Spur on July 17, 1995. Reg Button photo, author's collection. |
Today’s Throwback Thursday (or as it turns out, now Throwback Friday) features one
of the more interesting aspects of railroading: street running. Often mutually
unpopular to the local municipality and the railroad, street running is
increasingly hard to find. I find that to be a shame, since street running
often yields details not otherwise captured in our day-to-day photography, such
as the latest model year of a car in the photo, a popular local establishment’s
sign, or even fashion trends of people captured in the frame. With that in
mind, let’s get to our subject photo.
It’s July 17, 1995, and we find CN SW1200RS #1349 leading two cars up
the middle of Pine Street in Thorold, ON. It appears that train #549 has been
sent to lift two boxcars from the industry in the background – the Fraser Inc
paper mill (now Book Depot). The short train is now heading south down the
Fonthill Spur, riding up the small hills that pose little challenge to automobiles
and trucks but an interesting challenge to the train. Fraser Inc’s facility was
featured in Trevor Marshall’s post (here) on his Achievable Layouts blog and
provides many more interesting photos of the plant. At one time it appeared to
be quite the industry, handling both outgoing paper loads as well as tank cars
of chemicals and hopper cars of additives used in the paper making process.
Today, however, the business as well as the street running required to serve
the industry are gone, and Pine street is a bit less interesting (to me at
least). Street running is not gone altogether from the area though, as CN
successor Trillium Railway still uses a small piece of track down the middle of
Townline Road to serve Interlake Paper. They even have a CN-painted MLW S-13,
required due to sharp curvature on the line. Interestingly, CN 1349 must have
liked paper mills as it would go on to be CANX (Canac) 1349, one of the plant
switchers at Marathon Pulp in Marathon, ON until the plant closed in 2008. One
other interesting aspect of the photo is that it appears Pine Street is in the
middle of getting a makeover, judging by the cement truck and dump truck – as
the small time capsule of an image has recorded for posterity.
Cheers,
Peter.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)